On Syria: "...The
Western media has not only been wrong, but has lied on so many occasions in the
past, that it cannot be expected to tell the truth now."
By Shamus Cooke
The media spin machine is again kicking into high gear, perfectly timed to
accompany the "Geneva II" Syria peace talks. The lies are necessary
to give the Obama administration an upper hand in the peace negotiations, which
are not being used to pursue peace, but instead, to accomplish the Obama administration’s
longstanding goal of Syrian regime change.
Here are the top three Western media
lies about the Syrian peace talks.
1) The removal of Syrian Bashar al-Assad was an agreed upon "precondition"
for the Geneva II peace talks.
This lie has been repeated over and over by government and media alike. It
has zero basis...
2) The U.S.-backed rebel militias are "moderate" Islamic groups.
The fact that this lie can even be uttered publicly without encountering ridicule
is a major success of Western media propaganda...
3) New Evidence of Syrian government "industrial scale" torture.
...the lie here is that the Western media promoted the "evidence"
as being unquestionably true, when the story doesn’t reach first base when it
comes to evidence-based journalism...
...How do these lies become such permanent fixtures in the Western media?
An
excellent article in the Guardian newspaper recently discussed in depth
the principal sources the Western media has used to understand the Syrian conflict.
The article exposed the incredible bias of some of the most important Western
media sources on Syria, which is why they were handpicked in the first place
to be "expert" sources: they had political agendas that were aligned
with the US government’s foreign policy decisions. The other side of the conflict
was completely ignored, except when it was targeted for ridicule.
Thus, Americans
and Europeans [and Australians] have a completely one-sided, if not fantasy-based perspective
of what is happening in Syria. This has been systematic since the beginning
of the conflict, as happened with the Yugoslav, Afghan, Iraq, and Libya wars...
“The West
Publicly Claims to Be Fighting Terrorism, Whilst It Is Covertly Nourishing It.”
Must Read By Walid al-Moallem - Syria Foreign Minister
"...Today, in
this gathering of Arab and Western powers, we are presented with a simple
choice: we can choose to fight terrorism and extremism together and to start a
new political process, or you can continue to support terrorism in Syria. Let us
reject and isolate the black hands and the false faces, which publicly smile
but covertly feed terrorist ideology, striking Syria today, but ultimately
spreading to infect us all. This is the moment of truth and destiny; let us
rise to the challenge..." Continue
The Ugly
American (and Friends) in Geneva
By Daniel McAdams
"US Secretary of
State John Kerry's delusions continued as he arrived in Montreux, Switzerland
to open the "Geneva II" talks on the ongoing conflict in Syria...
Kerry proceeded to bully and blunder
his way through the pre-opening of the conference.
"We need to deal with reality here," Kerry said on the eve of the
conference. "Bashar Assad will not be part of that transition
government."
Kerry's pressure on Ban
to uninvite Iran to the conference — though Iran is far more affected by the
crisis than the majority of countries invited to participate — was based on
Iran's refusal to endorse the pre-condition of support for "regime
change" in Syria as the goal of the conference.
At least "regime
change" was the US
interpretation of the Geneva I Communique issued after that conference in 2012.
However the US appears to be purposely misinterpreting the
statement made after the Geneva
I conference.
According to the Communique
signed after that conference, there is no demand that Assad must leave office.
At most, the agreement calls for:
The establishment of a
transitional governing body which can establish a neutral environment in which
the transition can take place. That means that the transitional governing body
would exercise full executive powers. It could include members of the present
government and the opposition and other groups and shall be formed on the basis
of mutual consent.
If anyone is violating
the letter and spirit of the Geneva
Communique, it is the US/Saudi side. The US government demanding that Assad
must go clearly violates this statement in the Communique:
The sovereignty,
independence, unity and territorial integrity of Syria must be respected.
Therefore if any country
should be disqualified from participation in Geneva II on the basis of refusing
to observe to the Communique issued at the end of Geneva
I, it should be the US
and any other nation demanding the overthrow of the current Syrian government
as a pre-condition to further talks...
"...The
ongoing conflict in Syria was engineered by the West and its regional allies as
far back as 2007, revealed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his article, The Redirection: Is the Administration's new policy
benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism? which prophetically stated (emphasis added):
‘To undermine Iran,
which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect,
to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East.
In Lebanon, the
Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s
government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to
weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran.
The U.S.
has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of
these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that
espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and
sympathetic to Al Qaeda.’