The serial liars instantly blamed Russia for shooting down flight MH17.  But, did they really? That is a terrible accusation to make against any government, without proper evidence. 
So, where is their evidence?... 

Well, they are probably manufacturing it right now, according to this analysis by Pepe Escobar:

      ...Let's follow the facts.

          Washington from the get-go said it was Russian President Vladimir Putin's missile that downed MH17. They swore they had evidence. Like in               "We know. Trust us". The historical record for the past 60 years at least shows they cannot be trusted. There was never any evidence. Just spin.

Moscow, via the Defense Ministry, presented hard evidence. And called for an unbiased international investigation. Washington ignored it all - the call and the hard evidence.

The US Navy, crammed with state-of-the-art missile defense radars, has been in the Black Sea for weeks now. As much as the Russians, they have tracked every particle flying over Ukraine. The NSA goes for signals intelligence; the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency goes for phenomena in the imagery realm; the Defense Intelligence Agency adds Humint; there's the CIA; and there's the all-seeing, all-knowing Director of National Intelligence.

How come all this trillion-dollar Full Spectrum Dominance apparatus cannot come up with a single, conclusive piece of evidence?

The only risible "evidence" presented so far pictures the acronym salad of US intel agencies spending their time reading blogs and Twittering. As in the State Department head in Kiev twittering satellite imagery that the New York Times parroted "proved" Russia is shelling Ukraine from across the border. The proverbial "senior US officials" even had to tersely admit on the record they have no proof whatsoever about "Putin's missile". If they had, NATO would be ready to flip burgers in Red Square.

Based on the wealth of info now in the open, the top probability of what caused the MH17 tragedy was an R-60M air-to-air missile shot from a Ukrainian Su-25 - and not a BUK (there's also the possibility of a double down; first an R-60M and then a BUK). The R-60M is very fast, with an ideal engagement distance of up to five kilometers. That's how far the Su-25 detected by the Russians (they showed the graphics) was from MH17.

SBU - Ukrainian intel - for its part confiscated the recordings of Kiev control tower talking to MH17. That would certainly explain why MH17 was overflying a war zone (Malaysian Airlines revealed they were forced to). Hefty bets can be made the recordings are now being "doctored".

Then there are the black boxes, which will not de decoded by the Malaysians or by the Dutch, but by the Brits - acting under Washington's orders. As The Saker blogger summed up the view of top Russian specialists, "the Brits will now let the NSA falsify the data and that falsification will be coordinated with the SBU in Kiev which will eventually release the recordings who will fully 'confirm' the 'authenticity' of the NSA-doctored recordings from the UK." To make it more palatable, and erase suspicions about Anglo-American foul play, the Dutch will announce it.

Everyone should be forewarned...

Extract from article by Pepe Escobar

http://www.thanhniennews.com/commentaries/crime-israel-and-punishment-russia-29365.html

So, now you have been forewarned!

Of course, this has not stopped Australian Prime Minister 
Tony Abbott, other Western political leaders, and the dishonest Western news media, from repeating the anti-Russian lies, 
ad nauseum!

American Pravda: Who Shot Down Flight MH17 in Ukraine?

BY RON UNZ  ..."I am absolutely 100% certain that the [mainstream media] has been revealed as a totally worthless source of information on these crucial world events..."      http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-who-shot-down-flight-mh17-in-ukraine/

Check out this new Willie Nelson song video http://youtube/MezGqmMCrwo

"How Much Is A Liar's Word Worth?"