Jonathan Cook: “The response from the US, UK and France to a
briefing on Thursday at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) in the Hague was perverse, to say the least.
Russia had brought
17 witnesses from Douma who stated that there had been no chemical weapons
attack there earlier this month – the pretext for an illegal air strike on
Syria by the three western states.
The witnesses, a mix of victims and the
doctors who treated them, told accounts that
confirmed a report provided last week from Douma by British reporter Robert
Fisk – a report, it should be noted, that has been almost entirely blanked by
the western media.
According to the testimony provided at the OPCW, the victims
shown in a video from the site of the alleged attack were actually suffering
from the effects of inhaling dust after a bombing raid, not gas.
The first strange thing to note is that the US, UK and France
boycotted the meeting… The US, UK and France are surely obligated to listen to
the witnesses first, and then seek to discredit the testimony afterwards if
they think it implausible or coerced. The evidence cannot be tested and
rebutted if it is not even considered.
The second is that the media are echoing this misplaced scorn
for evidence… There is a word for that, and it is not “journalism”…
The third and biggest problem, however, is that neither the trio
of western states nor the western media are actually contesting the claim that
these “supposed witnesses” were present in Douma, and that some of them were
shown in the video…
No one, for example, appears to be doubting that Hassan Diab, a
boy who testified at the hearing, is also the boy shown in the video who was
supposedly gassed with a nerve agent three weeks ago.
How then do we explain that he is now looking a picture of
health? It is not as though the US, UK and French governments and the western
media have had no time to investigate his case. He and his father have been
saying for at least a week on Russian TV that there was no chemical attack…
…If there is one thing certain in all of this, it is that the
video produced as cast-iron evidence of a chemical weapons attack has turned
out to be nothing of the sort.”
Read the complete article by Jonathan Cook:
No comments:
Post a Comment